James quarshie idun biography of albert

The Supreme Court yesterday quizzed the litigants in the ongoing presidential election petition to seek clarification on aspects of their voluminous legal addresses. It also confirmed Thursday, August 29, as the date to deliver its judgment.

&#;

The clarification, which was used to wind up seven months of hearing of the petition, was in respect of re-categorisation of some exhibits submitted to the court, explanation of 'preferred date set', definition of over voting, statutory consequences of electoral irregularities, and dire consequences without going through the Biometric Verification Device (BVD).

&#;

Others were on the principle of annulling election results, retroactive application of the law, and invalidation of the results and statutory consequences of electoral irregularity.

&#;

Philip Addison, lead counsel for the petitioners, set the ball rolling when Justice William Atuguba, the presiding Judge of the nine-member panel, wanted him to clarify how the petitioners re-